The Real Deal Panel Youtube Link
Marc Norman, Associate Dean at NYU’s Schack Institute of Real Estate, joined Don Peebles of Peebles Corporation and former presidential candidate Andrew Yang at a Real Deal panel to take stock of what New York City’s mayoral race means for the property market, and his central message was characteristically grounded: ambitious housing promises mean little without the policy mechanics to back them up. The conversation ranged from entitlement reform and union politics to the arithmetic of ranked choice voting, with Norman providing the analytical backbone throughout.
On the question of New York’s development environment, Norman built on Don Peebles’s framing of the city as a business, noting that New York’s GDP is roughly comparable to Australia’s and that governing it demands genuine economic literacy. He was measured but pointed on the subject of housing pledges from mayoral candidates: “Any candidate that says I’m going to build 100,000, 400,000, or a million units, unless they’re also saying the developers they’re going to work with and the policies they’re going to change, I wouldn’t believe them.” He acknowledged that Adams’s City of Yes rezoning was a genuine achievement, but cautioned that actual unit delivery would fall well short of the numbers being cited on the campaign trail until the underlying mechanics of entitlement, subsidy allocation, and permitting are fundamentally reformed.
Norman’s broader point was that the mathematics of the race matter as much as the rhetoric. With the Democratic primary in June, turnout historically hovers around 10 to 11% of all New Yorkers, meaning a narrow and highly motivated slice of the electorate will determine the city’s next leader. He noted that Andrew Cuomo’s polling at around 40% and near-universal name recognition make him extremely difficult to displace, while candidates competing for the progressive vote risk splitting it across multiple contenders. On the subject of open primaries, Norman was direct, pointing to the Charter Revision Commission as a vehicle for the kind of structural change that would make city elections more representative and ultimately produce better policy outcomes for the industry.
The panel closed with a note that resonated across the room: real estate is the one industry that cannot pick up and move to a more favourable city. Whether the next mayor is a known commodity or an upstart, the industry has no choice but to engage, and Norman’s presence at the table reflected exactly that commitment.
Leave a Reply